![]() |
||||||||
Author,
writer, journalist, photographer, trainer and facilitator based in Scotland, UK |
||||||||
Should Fathers be at the birth?In Britain this year, nine out of ten fathers will witness the birth of their baby. Our expectation that Dad will be there if he possibly can, is unique; throughout history in all known cultures, birth has been “women’s business” with fathers expected to keep out of the way. Who is right? More importantly, will you ask your partner to be there? Caroline Deacon investigates. The pendulum is swinging back again, as Dr Michel Odent, the internationally famous doctor who introduced the concept of home-like birthing rooms and birthing pools into French state hospitals in the 1970s, has spoken out against fathers attending births. He says that men inhibit women’s natural responses in what should be a “primeval act”; going as far as to blame fathers for the rise in caesarean section rates. Dr Odent claims that fathers’ presence is not natural, and that they increase the pressure for an artificial birth, because they find their wives’ pain disturbing. “When a woman gives birth she needs to lose herself in the primitive or limbic part of her brain. An anxious father, who constantly asks ‘rational’ inadvertently stimulates the intellectual part of her brain,” he claims. “In aiming to protect her, he might request an epidural or caesarean so she won’t have to endure too much pain.” Historically men have never been present at births; traditionally they were sent to the kitchen to boil water while mother and midwife got on with it. Dr Odent comments, “Think about it – what did they really needs those gallons of water for? It simply gave the fathers something to do.” In other societies, grandmothers or other experienced female relatives attend the birth, and indeed in many of these cultures, births tend to rely on fewer drugs and have less surgical interventions. In Japan, for example, where husbands carry on with their normal day-to-day business while their wives give birth, the epidural rate is less than 1%. It is certainly true that caesarean rates are rising, as well as assisted (forceps and ventouse) deliveries. It is also true that most women, as long as it’s safe for them and their babies, would prefer to have a normal birth. The World Health Organisation recommends that caesarean rates need to be no higher than 10-15% of all births, yet in Britain the rate is 17% and rising. However, this may have less to do with father’s presence and more to do with fear of litigation. Caesarean rates vary between maternity units, with some hospitals’ statistics as high as one in four. At these hospitals, fathers attend births just as they do in hospitals with the commendable rates of 10% or less. Perhaps, then, it’s not Dad that’s to blame for the rise in interventions. The reality is that we’ve moved away from a situation where most women gave birth at home or in small maternity units to the current picture where the majority of births take place in consultant-led units in large hospitals, where interventions are far more likely. Recent research in this country also shows that having a midwife in attendance who is known to you has a significant effect. Women who labour with a known midwife need less pain relief or interventions and have shorter labours. Unfortunately, one to one midwifery care, as this is known, is less likely to occur in large consultant-led units. Where it does, for instance in the Hammersmith Hospitals, studies have found that women are more satisfied with their care, feel more confident and more prepared for the birth and care of their baby. There are also significant reductions in use of epidurals. To guarantee the presence of a known midwife probably means private care – not cheap. A less costly alternative is to employ a doula. This is a woman who has given birth, who is not medically qualified, but who has been trained to accompany and support women in labour. However, the vast majority of women giving birth this year will never have met their midwife before. Giving birth is a great unknown, hospitals are unfamiliar environments, so it can be a great help to have someone who is on your side. Should this be your partner? The NCT thinks that this “depends on the man. Our research has revealed evidence that lots of women benefit from their partners being there and find them immensely supportive. The most important thing is that the woman who is giving birth feels relaxed, confident and happy.” Michel Odent thinks “another woman who is already a mother herself” should accompany us. Doesn’t this sound like mother or even mother-in-law? Many of us do not have mother on tap, and those who do, would not necessarily relish her presence. Why should we be less inhibited in front of her anyway? Something Michel Odent has missed is that our society today is pretty unique in the break down of sex roles. Many men play a far larger part in raising children than their fathers did. Most women return to work rather than fully immersing themselves in full-time motherhood. Men and women are also often well informed about birth and have clear ideas about how their children should come into the world. Couples often attend ante-natal classes together, and those men say how helpful these were in preparing them to be useful birth partners. Perhaps rather than making a blanket decision to exclude your partner, it is better to make sure he is well informed, and consider whether he will be useful to you. You are entitled to decide, and to have more than one person anyway if you want, so by all leave him behind and bring mother, mother in law and the neighbours too – but be prepared for some raised eyebrows. Yes he should be there….
Who is likely to be with you when you give birth? © Caroline Deacon |
| Copyright, Legal Matters, Terms and Conditions | © Caroline Deacon 2006 |